CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Korean sandlance

species of fish

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ680198
Source-derived summary

The Korean sandlance (Hypoptychus dybowskii) is a species of marine ray-finned fish belonging to the family Hypoptychidae. The Korean sandlance is the only species in this monotypic family and genus and is found in the northwestern Pacific Ocean.

Taxonomy

The Korean sandlance was first formally described in 1880 by the Austrian ichthyologist Franz Steindachner with its type locality given as Peter the Great Bay. Steindachner also classified in the monospecific genus Hypoptychus and in the monogeneric family Hypoptychidae. This family described a monotypic and is included in the suborder Gasterosteoidei of the order Scorpaeniformes in the 5th edition of Fishes of the World. Other authorities treat the Gasterosteoidei as the infraorder Gasterosteales within the suborder Cottoidei or as a sister clade to the Zoarcales in the order Zoarciformes. Some authorities include the tubenose (Aulichthys japonicus) in the Hypoptychidae, but the 5th edition of Fishes of the World puts this taxon in the family Aulorhynchidae.

Etymology

The Korean sandlance's genus name, Hypoptychus, is a combination of hypo, which means "under", and ptychos, meaning "fold", an allusion to the long skin fin fold on the lower surface of the body in that taxon. The specific name likely honours the Polish biologist Benedykt Dybowski, who was a worker on the fauna of the Russian Far East.

Description

The Korean sandlance has an elongate body which has no scales, scutes or spines.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Korean sandlance” as species of fish. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Korean, sandlance and species.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1880—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Korean, sandlance and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Korean sandlance”, the useful work is to connect “species of fish” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q680198. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1880.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Korean sandlance”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Korean sandlance primary sources, Korean sandlance archive and Korean research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Korean sandlance”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Korean sandlance” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.