CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Korea Baduk Association

South Korean organization

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ495384 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Korea Baduk Association, also known as Hanguk Kiwon (Korean: 한국기원), is the organization that oversees Go (baduk) and Go tournaments in South Korea. It was founded in 1945 by Cho Namchul as the Hanseong Kiwon.

Baduk is a game which was present in Korea by the 5th century. It originated in China, but the West is more familiar with the Japanese name Go. This is because the Japanese were the first to introduce it to the West. Japan was introduced to the game in the 7th century AD. Initially, most Korean players followed the sunjang style of beginning by placing sixteen stones—eight white and eight black—on the board in a preset pattern. Cho Namchul, who had studied in Japan, knew that the international players began with an empty board like Japan since Japan was the first to introduce the game to the West. By forming the association, he set about convincing Koreans players to use the "modern" style.

See also

International Go Federation

List of professional Go tournaments

American Go Association

European Go Federation

Nihon Ki-in (Japanese Go Association)

Taiwan Chi-Yuan (Taiwanese Go Association)

Chinese Weiqi Association (Chinese Go Association)

References

External links

Official Website of Korea Baduk Association

History of the Hanguk Kiwon as remembered by its founder, Cho Namchul Archived 2003-02-27 at the Wayback Machine

Map of the location of Hanguk Kiwon in Seoul - Address: 315 Honik-Dong Seongdong-Gu.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Korea Baduk Association” as south Korean organization. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1945, 2003—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1945-11. The account is most persuasive where Korea, Baduk and Association can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as south Korean organization. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q495384. VIAF identifies the subject as 141945630. The Library of Congress control number is n84129550. 1 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1945 and 2003.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Korea Baduk Association”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Korea Baduk Association primary sources, Korea Baduk Association archive and Korea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Korea Baduk Association”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Korea Baduk Association” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.