CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Eucalyptus petrensis

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 3, 2022
Entity authorityQ15354307
Source-derived summary

Eucalyptus petrensis, commonly known as limestone mallee, straggly mallee or koodjat, is a species of straggly mallee that is endemic to Western Australia. It has mostly smooth bark, lance-shaped adult leaves, flower buds in groups of between seven and thirteen, creamy white flowers and more or less spherical fruit.

Description

Eucalyptus petrensis is a straggly mallee that typically grows to a height of 1.5 to 4 metres (4.9 to 13.1 ft) and forms a lignotuber. It has smooth, light grey bark that is shed in strips, sometimes with rough bark at the base of the trunk. Young plants and coppice regrowth have dull green, egg-shaped leaves that are 45–110 mm (1.8–4.3 in) long and 30–50 mm (1.2–2.0 in) wide. Adult leaves are the same shade of glossy green on both sides, lance-shaped, 80–120 mm (3.1–4.7 in) long and 10–27 mm (0.39–1.06 in) wide, tapering to a petiole 4–15 mm (0.16–0.59 in) long. The flower buds are arranged in leaf axils in groups of between seven and thirteen on an unbranched peduncle 5–10 mm (0.20–0.39 in) long, the individual buds on pedicels 2–3 mm (0.079–0.118 in) long. Mature buds are 10–15 mm (0.39–0.59 in) long and 4–5 mm (0.16–0.20 in) wide with a beaked operculum that is two or three times as long as the floral cup. Flowering occurs from June to July or October and the flowers are creamy white. The fruit is a woody, more or less spherical capsule 5–8 mm (0.20–0.31 in) long and 7–10 mm (0.28–0.39 in) wide with the valves initially protruding but fragile.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Eucalyptus petrensis” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Eucalyptus, petrensis and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 258-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Eucalyptus, petrensis and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Eucalyptus petrensis”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 3, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q15354307. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Eucalyptus petrensis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Eucalyptus petrensis primary sources, Eucalyptus petrensis archive and Eucalyptus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Eucalyptus petrensis”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Eucalyptus petrensis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.