CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Konstantin Khudoley

Russian political scientist

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 1, 2023
Entity authorityQ4502174 ↗
Source-derived summary

Konstantin Konstantinowitsch Khudoley (1951) is a member of the steering committee of the Petersburg Dialogue and the vice rector, vice chairman of the science council and the manager of the Chair of European Studies in Saint Petersburg State University.

Career

He is the secretary of the Russian Committee of Coordination and the leader of the Russian workgroup “Politics“in the russian-german forum „The Dialogue of Peterburg.“ Khudoley is one of the founders and a board member of the institute „North Dimension," which is an association connecting several universities, science and research centres on the respective subjects. Khudoley is a member of the United Nations University and a board member in multiple Russian and international professional and socio-political organizations. He regularly appears on Russian and foreign media.

Academical career

His scientific interests are focused on the relations between Russia, EU and NATO. He is the author of multiple scientific publications that have been published in Russia as well as other European countries. Aspects covered in these articles include the mechanisms of cooperation and perspectives of development between Russia, EU and NATO. Also, the problems of cooperation in the Baltic region, the Russian policies on the Balkans and the general European cooperation in the field of education are covered. Lectures on these topics have been held by Khudoley on multiple high-ranking international conferences.

Editorial summary

“Konstantin Khudoley” enters the record as russian political scientist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Konstantin, Khudoley and Russian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1951—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1951-05-30. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Konstantin, Khudoley and Russian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Konstantin Khudoley” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Konstantin, Khudoley and Russian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 1, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q4502174. VIAF identifies the subject as 43299749. The Library of Congress control number is n85339499. 2 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1951.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Konstantin Khudoley”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Konstantin Khudoley primary sources, Konstantin Khudoley archive and Konstantin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Konstantin Khudoley”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Konstantin Khudoley” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.