CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Klubi

brand of cigarette

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ18757589 ↗
Source-derived summary

Klubi was a Finnish brand of cigarettes, which was manufactured by "Rettig Group Oy Ab".

History

Klubi was founded in 1901 and was sold with a number of different variants of cigarettes. The best known of these were the Klubi 7 (Club 7) and its successor Klubi 77 (Club 77), so-called "straw clubs" with hollow paper holders and green-and-white packaging, the white inner cover of which was allegedly used by people for taking notes and even architectural drawing.

In the beginning of the 20th century, consumers began to demand lighter cigarettes from the Rettig plant. The first product versions were Klubi 1 (1901) and Klubi 2 (1902), but these were not very popular in Finland, although the Klubi 2 cigarette reached an export success in the United Kingdom. Domestic success began with the Klubi 7 variant in 1907. The best-selling Klubi cigarette products from the 1910s until the 1930s besides the Klubi 7 were the Klubi 17, the Klubi Malta became popular variants while more and more Klubi cigarettes were introduced to the market.

In 1943 the Klubi 7 variant had to be replaced due to a lack of raw materials with a new version called Klubi 77, which then became the all-time most popular Klubi variant.

Klubi cigarettes were produced until the mid 1990s, when new anti-tobacco regulations of the European Union became a major obstacle. No agreement had been reached about the necessary production technology of low-tar cigarettes.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Klubi” is brand of cigarette. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Klubi, brand and cigarette, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1901, 1902, 1907, 1943—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Klubi, brand and cigarette is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “brand of cigarette” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18757589. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1901, 1902, 1907 and 1943.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Klubi”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Klubi primary sources, Klubi archive and Klubi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Klubi”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Klubi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.