Klein–Kramers equation
Partial differential equation

In physics and mathematics, the Klein–Kramers equation or sometimes referred as Kramers–Chandrasekhar equation is a partial differential equation that describes the probability density function f (r, p, t) of a Brownian particle in phase space (r, p). It is a special case of the Fokker–Planck equation.
In one spatial dimension, f is a function of three independent variables: the scalars x, p, and t. In this case, the Klein–Kramers equation is
∂
f
∂
t
+
p
m
∂
f
∂
x
=
ξ
∂
∂
p
(
p
f
)
+
∂
∂
p
(
d
V
d
x
f
)
+
m
ξ
k
B
T
∂
2
f
∂
p
2
{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial f}{\partial t}}+{\frac {p}{m}}{\frac {\partial f}{\partial x}}=\xi {\frac {\partial }{\partial p}}\left(p\,f\right)+{\frac {\partial }{\partial p}}\left({\frac {dV}{dx}}\,f\right)+m\xi k_{\mathrm {B} }T\,{\frac {\partial ^{2}f}{\partial p^{2}}}}
where V(x) is the external potential, m is the particle mass, ξ is the friction (drag) coefficient, T is the temperature, and kB is the Boltzmann constant. In d spatial dimensions, the equation is
∂
f
∂
t
+
1
m
p
⋅
∇
r
f
=
ξ
∇
p
⋅
(
p
f
)
+
∇
p
⋅
(
∇
V
(
r
)
f
)
+
m
ξ
k
B
T
∇
p
2
f
{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial f}{\partial t}}+{\frac {1}{m}}\mathbf {p} \cdot \nabla _{\mathbf {r} }f=\xi \nabla _{\mathbf {p} }\cdot \left(\mathbf {p} \,f\right)+\nabla _{\mathbf {p} }\cdot \left(\nabla V(\mathbf {r} )\,f\right)+m\xi k_{\mathrm {B} }T\,\nabla _{\mathbf {p} }^{2}f}
Here
∇
r
{\displaystyle \nabla _{\mathbf {r} }}
and
∇
p
{\displaystyle \nabla _{\mathbf {p} }}
are the gradient operator with respect to r and p, and
∇
p
2
{\displaystyle \nabla _{\mathbf {p} }^{2}}
is the Laplacian with respect to p.
The fractional Klein-Kramers equation is a generalization that incorporates anomalous diffusion by way of fractional calculus.
Physical basis
The physical model underlying the Klein–Kramers equation is that of an underdamped Brownian particle. Unlike standard Brownian motion, which is overdamped, underdamped Brownian motion takes the friction to be finite, in which case the momentum remains an independent degree of freedom.
Mathematically, a particle's state is described by its position r and momentum p, which evolve in time according to the Langevin equations
r
˙
=
p
m
p
˙
=
−
ξ
p
−
∇
V
(
r
)
+
2
m
ξ
k
B
T
η
(
t
)
,
⟨
η
T
(
t
)
η
(
t
′
)
⟩
=
I
δ
(
t
−
t
′
)
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\dot {\mathbf {r} }}&={\frac {\mathbf {p} }{m}}\\{\dot {\mathbf {p} }}&=-\xi \,\mathbf {p} -\nabla V(\mathbf {r} )+{\sqrt {2m\xi k_{\mathrm {B} }T}}{\boldsymbol {\eta }}(t),\qquad \langle {\boldsymbol {\eta }}^{\mathrm {T} }(t){\boldsymbol {\eta }}(t')\rangle =\mathbf {I} \delta (t-t')\end{aligned}}}
Here
η
(
t
)
{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\eta }}(t)}
is d-dimensional Gaussian white noise, which models the thermal fluctuations of p in a background medium of temperature T.
η
{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\eta }}}
is a row vector, making
⟨
η
T
(
t
)
η
(
t
′
)
⟩
{\displaystyle \langle {\boldsymbol {\eta }}^{\mathrm {T} }(t){\boldsymbol {\eta }}(t')\rangle }
an outer product;
I
{\displaystyle \mathbf {I} }
is the d by d identity matrix.
These equations are analogous to Newton's second law of motion, but due to the noise term
η
(
t
)
{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\eta }}(t)}
are stochastic ("random") rather than deterministic.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Klein–Kramers equation” as partial differential equation. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as partial differential equation. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q110269413. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Klein–Kramers equation”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Klein–Kramers equation primary sources, Klein–Kramers equation archive and Klein research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Klein–Kramers equation”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Klein–Kramers equation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.