CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Liber de compositione alchemiae

work on alchemy falsely attributed to the Umayyad prince Khalid ibn Yazid (c. 668 – c. 704)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 6, 2024
Entity authorityQ4257922 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Liber de compositione alchemiae ("Book on the Composition of Alchemy"), also known as the Testamentum Morieni ("Testament of Morienus"), the Morienus, or by its Arabic title Masāʾil Khālid li-Maryānus al-rāhib ("Khalid's Questions to the Monk Maryanos"), is a work on alchemy falsely attributed to the Umayyad prince Khalid ibn Yazid (c. 668 – c. 704). It is generally considered to be the first Latin translation of an Arabic work on alchemy into Latin, completed on 11 February 1144 by the English Arabist Robert of Chester.

The work takes the form of a dialogue between Khalid ibn Yazid and his purported alchemical master, the Byzantine monk Morienus (Arabic مريانس, Maryānus, perhaps from Greek Μαριανός, Marianos), himself supposedly a pupil of the philosopher Stephanus of Alexandria (fl. early seventh century). Widely popular among later alchemists, the work is extant in many manuscripts and has been printed and translated into vernacular languages several times since the sixteenth century.

Arabic text

The Latin translation is for the most part based on an Arabic source, though both the Arabic Masāʾil Khālid li-Maryānus al-rāhib and the Latin Liber de compositione alchemiae contain sections not present in the other. The Arabic text belongs to the alchemical works associated with Khalid ibn Yazid, which are widely regarded as ninth- or tenth-century forgeries, although it has also been argued that some of them may go back to the eighth century. Since one manuscript of the Masāʾil Khālid li-Maryānus al-rāhib contains a citation from the early tenth-century work Muṣḥaf al-ḥayāt ("Book of Life") attributed to Ibn Umayl (c. 900 – c. 960), the work may have been originally written in the latter half of the tenth century.

Latin text

The word alchemia in the Latin title does not yet refer to the art of alchemy, but rather to the mysterious material which alchemists claimed could transmute one substance into another (i.e., the elixir or philosophers' stone). The actual meaning of the Latin title is thus "the book on the composition of the elixir". As the Latin translator states in his preface:

This book styles itself the composition of alchemy.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Liber de compositione alchemiae” is work on alchemy falsely attributed to the Umayyad prince Khalid ibn Yazid (c. 668 – c. 704). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Liber, compositione and alchemiae, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1144—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Liber, compositione and alchemiae is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “work on alchemy falsely attributed to the Umayyad prince Khalid ibn Yazid (c. 668 – c. 704)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 6, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q4257922. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1144.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Liber de compositione alchemiae”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Liber de compositione alchemiae primary sources, Liber de compositione alchemiae archive and Liber research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Liber de compositione alchemiae”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Liber de compositione alchemiae” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.