CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Kingdom Rush

2011 video game

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ6412516 ↗
Source-derived summary

Kingdom Rush is a 2011 tower defense game developed by Ironhide Game Studio and published by Armor Games. In the game's medieval fantasy setting, players take control of a general serving under King Denas of Linirea, who must defend the land from an onslaught of evil monsters. Each level is composed of a number of pre-set roads, which the player can place defensive towers around to fight off the approaching monsters. Slaying enemies gives the player gold, which they can use to buy new towers or upgrade existing ones to improve their capabilities.

Kingdom Rush was developed over the span of six months by the Uruguay-based developer Ironhide Game Studio. The studio was founded in 2010 by Álvaro Azofra, Pablo Realini and Gonzalo Sande, who conceived Kingdom Rush as their first major project after working on a number of minor Flash games. After seeing the success of tower defense games, the three decided to replicate the basic strategy of the genre, combining it with elements of other games they played in their youth.

Kingdom Rush was first released in July 2011 as a free browser game. Versions for iOS devices were released in December 2011, followed by ports to Android in May 2013, and Windows and macOS in January 2014. A later release for Nintendo Switch was published in July 2020, and the Xbox One version was released in January 2023.

Editorial summary

“Kingdom Rush” enters the record as 2011 video game. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Kingdom, Rush and video can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011, 2010, 2013, 2014—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—2011-07-28, 2011-12-19, 2012-06-28, 2014-01-06—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Kingdom, Rush and video.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Kingdom Rush” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Kingdom, Rush and video provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6412516. 6 of 8 selected statements include explicit references; 8 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2011, 2010, 2013 and 2014.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kingdom Rush”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kingdom Rush primary sources, Kingdom Rush archive and Kingdom research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kingdom Rush”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Kingdom Rush” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.