Green Party of Canada candidates in the 2006 Canadian federal election
Open-knowledge reference entry
The Green Party of Canada ran a full slate of 308 candidates in the 2006 Canadian federal election. Some of these candidates have separate biography pages; relevant information about other candidates may be found here.
The candidates are listed by province and riding name.
Prince Edward Island
Sharon Labchuk (Malpeque)
Sharon Labchuk previously ran for the Green Party in the 2004 federal election, also in Malpeque. She lost to Wayne Easter of the Liberal Party of Canada. Labchuk received 1,037 votes to Easter's 9,782.
Nova Scotia
Chris Milburn (Sydney—Victoria)
Chris Milburn is a physician. He was born in Sydney, Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, and trained in emergency and family medicine at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. Milburn held several medical positions in and around the Kingston area after graduating, including a stint as a clinic doctor in Lansdowne after the small community lost its previous doctor (KWS, 22 November 2000). He is also a skilled athlete, and has participated in several triathlons.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Green Party of Canada candidates in the 2006 Canadian federal election” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Green, Party and Canada, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5602987. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 2004 and 2000.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Green Party of Canada candidates in the 2006 Canadian federal election”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Green Party of Canada candidates in the 2006 Canadian federal election primary sources, Green Party of Canada candidates in the 2006 Canadian federal election archive and Green research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Green Party of Canada candidates in the 2006 Canadian federal election”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Green Party of Canada candidates in the 2006 Canadian federal election” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.