CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Killing of Bich Pan

Canadian convicted murderer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ21064188 ↗
Source-derived summary

On November 8, 2010, police in Markham, Ontario, Canada, a suburb of Toronto, responded to a report of a robbery and assault at the Unionville home of Hann and Bich Pan, ethnically Chinese immigrants from Vietnam. Both had been shot repeatedly; Bich died of her injuries, and Hann was permanently blinded. The investigation revealed that the crime was not a robbery but instead a kill-for-hire arranged by the couple's daughter Jennifer Pan. She had expected to inherit her parents' money and was angered that they had forbidden her to see her boyfriend after they discovered she had been deceiving them about her education.

Jennifer's police interrogation involved a technique in Canada, where police are legally allowed to lie to those they are interrogating regarding the evidence they have allegedly collected, and the strategies they are using. At trial, Pan was found guilty on multiple charges and sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for 25 years, the same penalty as her co-conspirators. In May 2023, the Court of Appeal for Ontario ordered a retrial for Pan and her co-conspirators on the charge of first-degree murder of her mother, allowing for the possibility that – despite explicitly waiting until Bich was home before signalling the killers to enter – they might only have planned to murder Hann, and the jury should have been allowed to consider that option; the Court of Appeal upheld the attempted murder convictions for the shooting of Hann. Two years later, in April 2025, the Supreme Court of Canada sustained the appeal.

In 2026 the Crown was ordered to retry the four defendants charged in the killing then still alive. All pleaded guilty to lesser charges that made them immediately eligible for parole.

Editorial summary

“Killing of Bich Pan” enters the record as canadian convicted murderer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Killing, Bich and Canadian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 2023, 2025, 2026—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1986-06-17. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Killing, Bich and Canadian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Killing of Bich Pan” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Killing, Bich and Canadian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21064188. VIAF identifies the subject as 5303151051911733530005. The Library of Congress control number is n2017067107. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2010, 2023, 2025 and 2026.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Killing of Bich Pan”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Killing of Bich Pan primary sources, Killing of Bich Pan archive and Killing research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Killing of Bich Pan”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Killing of Bich Pan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.