CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Khwairakpam Chaoba

Manipuri poet, essayist, novelist

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ6403405 ↗
Source-derived summary

Khwairakpam Chaoba Singh was a poet, essayist, prose-writer and novelist. He was born in 1895 in Uripok Sorbon Thingen Leikai, Imphal. He is regarded as one of the pioneer writers of modern Meitei literature. He founded the Manipuri Sahitya Sammelan of Meitei literature along with Lamabam Kamal Singh, Hijam Irabot and Hijam Anganghal.

Biography

He presented the first historical novel in Meitei – Lavangalata which is considered to be an outstanding work. This is perhaps one of the greatest novels in Meitei literature. His other prose works are Wakhalgi Ichen (Thought Current), Wakhal (Thought), Phidam (Ideal), Kannaba Wa (Useful Words) and Chhatra Macha (Student). He also wrote incomplete works Madhu Malati and Naba-Malika His published work includes:

Chhatra Macha, 1923

Kannaba Wa, 1924

Phidam

Wakhal

Wakhalgi Ichen

Thainagi Leirang, Poetry, 1933

Lavangalata, Novel, 1937

Recognition and reception

He was awarded the Sahitya Ratna by the Manipur Sahitya Parishad in 1948. Fellow author and poet Elangbam Dinamani Singh included Chaoba in his one of his books about criticism of poets. In Amaresh Datta's Encyclopedia of Indian Literature, Volume 1, he says of Chaoba: "By use of common language and very homely image, [he] could set a good example of elegy in Meitei through this single poem.

Editorial summary

“Khwairakpam Chaoba” enters the record as manipuri poet, essayist, novelist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Khwairakpam, Chaoba and Manipuri can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1895, 1923, 1924, 1933—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1895-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Khwairakpam, Chaoba and Manipuri.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Khwairakpam Chaoba” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Khwairakpam, Chaoba and Manipuri provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6403405. VIAF identifies the subject as 295103559. The Library of Congress control number is n2012215475. None of the 3 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1895, 1923, 1924 and 1933.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Khwairakpam Chaoba”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Khwairakpam Chaoba primary sources, Khwairakpam Chaoba archive and Khwairakpam research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Khwairakpam Chaoba”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Khwairakpam Chaoba” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.