CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Khoznavar

village in Syunik Province of Armenia

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ2224070 ↗
Source-derived summary

Khoznavar (Armenian: Խոզնավար) is a village in the Tegh Municipality of the Syunik Province in Armenia.

Demographics

The Statistical Committee of Armenia reported its population as 407 in 2010, down from 458 at the 2001 census.

Editorial summary

“Khoznavar” enters the record as village in Syunik Province of Armenia. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Khoznavar, village and Syunik can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 2001—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Khoznavar, village and Syunik.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Khoznavar” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Khoznavar, village and Syunik provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2224070. Authority coordinates are 39.621, 46.356. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2010 and 2001.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Khoznavar”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Khoznavar primary sources, Khoznavar archive and Khoznavar research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Khoznavar”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Khoznavar” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.