CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Khorata

genus of arachnids

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ2200555
Source-derived summary

Khorata is a genus of Asian cellar spiders that was first described by B. A. Huber in 2005.

Species

As of August 2025, the genus includes 55 species:

Khorata bachma Yao & Li, 2018 – Vietnam

Khorata bangkok Huber, 2005 – Thailand, Laos

Khorata bayeri Yao, Li & Jäger, 2014 – Thailand

Khorata circularis Yao & Li, 2013 – Laos

Khorata cucphuong Yao & Li, 2018 – Vietnam

Khorata dangi Yao, Pham & Li, 2015 – Vietnam

Khorata danxia Sheng & Xu, 2021 – China

Khorata dawei Yao & Li, 2019 – China

Khorata diaoluoshanensis Tong & Li, 2008 – China

Khorata digitata Yao & Li, 2010 – China, Vietnam

Khorata dongkou Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata dupla Yao & Li, 2013 – Laos

Khorata epunctata Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata flabelliformis Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata fusui Zhang & Zhu, 2009 – China

Khorata guiensis Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata huberi Yao, Pham & Li, 2015 – Vietnam

Khorata jaegeri Huber, 2005 – Laos

Khorata kep Lan, Jäger & Li, 2021 – Cambodia

Khorata khammouan Huber, 2005 (type) – Laos

Khorata libo Yao & Li, 2019 – China

Khorata liuzhouensis Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata luojinensis Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata luoping Yao & Li, 2019 – China

Khorata macilenta Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata matang Yao & Li, 2019 – China

Khorata miaoshanensis Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata musee Lan & Li, 2021 – Thailand

Khorata nani Xu, Zheng & Yao, 2020 – China

Khorata nanningensis Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata ningming Zhang & Zhu, 2009 – China

Khorata ningyuan Wei & Xu, 2014 – China

Khorata ninhbinh Zhang, Li & Yao, 2024 - Vietnam

Khorata palace Yao & Li, 2018 – Vietnam

Khorata paquini Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata protumida Yao, Pham & Li, 2015 – Vietnam

Khorata qian Yao & Li, 2019 – China

Khorata quangbinh Yao & Li, 2018 – Vietnam

Khorata robertmurphyi Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata rongshuiensis Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata sancai Wei & Xu, 2014 – China

Khorata schwendingeri Huber, 2005 – Thailand, Laos

Khorata shao Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata suwei Yao & Li, 2019 – China

Khorata triangula Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata vinhphuc Yao & Li, 2018 – Vietnam

Khorata wangae Yao & Li, 2010 – China

Khorata wenshan Yao & Li, 2019 – China

Khorata xingyi Chen, Zhang & Zhu, 2009 – China

Khorata yangchun Yao & Li, 2019 – China

Khorata yuhaoi Xu, Zheng & Yao, 2020 – China

Khorata zhui Zhang & Zhang, 2008 – China

Khorata qianlei – Li, Li & Yao, 2025 China

Khorata qunzhen Yao & Liu, 2025

See also

List of Pholcidae species

Recent taxonomic advances

In 2025, scientists from China described a new species of Khorata, named Khorata qianlei, discovered in Guangxi province. This brought the total number of known species in the genus to 54. In the same study, the researchers proposed dividing the genus into nine species groups, to better organize the diversity of forms observed within Khorata.

These groups were created based on the shape and arrangement of certain body parts involved in reproduction, which differ slightly between species. For example, some species have unique spines, hooks, or plates on their reproductive organs, which help distinguish them from others. This new classification helps scientists better understand the evolutionary relationships between species in Khorata and improves the tools for identifying them, which is important for studying biodiversity in Asia's forests and cave.

Editorial summary

“Khorata” enters the record as genus of arachnids. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Khorata, genus and arachnids can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005, 2025, 2018, 2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Khorata, genus and arachnids.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Khorata” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Khorata, genus and arachnids provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2200555. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2005, 2025, 2018 and 2014.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Khorata”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Khorata primary sources, Khorata archive and Khorata research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Khorata”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Khorata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.