CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Kurt Gödel Society

learned society

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 26, 2025
Entity authorityQ6446756
Source-derived summary

The Kurt Gödel Society (KGS) is a learned society which was founded in Vienna, Austria in 1987. It is an international organization aimed at promoting research primarily on logic, philosophy and the history of mathematics, with special attention to subjects that are connected with the Austrian logician and mathematician Kurt Gödel, in whose honour it was named.

The group also organizes an ongoing lecture series called Collegium Logicum. Former speakers include Henk Barendregt, George Boolos, Jaakko Hintikka and Wilfrid Hodges.

In April 2006, the Gödel society organized Horizons of Truth, an international symposium celebrating the 100th birthday of Kurt Gödel. The Gödel society, with support from the John Templeton Foundation, awards "Kurt Gödel Research Prize Fellowships". In 2008, a total amount of US$ 680,000 was awarded to the recipients David Fernández-Duque, Pavel Hrubeš, Andrey Bovykin, Peter Koellner, and Thierry Coquand. In 2011, a total amount of EUR 450,000, was awarded to the recipients Danko Ilik, Sean Walsh, Maryanthe Malliaris, Matteo Viale, and Ulrich Kohlenbach. In 2015, SIGLOG, EATCS, EACSL and the Kurt Gödel Society established the "Alonzo Church Award for Outstanding Contributions to Logic and Computation".

Editorial summary

“Kurt Gödel Society” enters the record as learned society. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Kurt, Gödel and Society can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1987, 2006, 2008, 2011—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1987. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Kurt, Gödel and Society.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Kurt Gödel Society” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Kurt, Gödel and Society provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q6446756. VIAF identifies the subject as 167719890. The Library of Congress control number is n93069421. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1987, 2006, 2008 and 2011.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kurt Gödel Society”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kurt Gödel Society primary sources, Kurt Gödel Society archive and Kurt research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kurt Gödel Society”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Kurt Gödel Society” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.