CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Kevin Ngan

Hong Kong fencer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ6397091 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ngan Kwoon Yat Kevin (Chinese: 顏冠一; Jyutping: ngaan4 gun3 jat1; born 18 October 1983) is a fencer from Hong Kong, China who won a bronze medal at both the 2006 Asian Games and the 2010 Asian Games in the men's foil team competition.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Kevin Ngan” is hong Kong fencer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Kevin, Ngan and Hong, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1983, 2006, 2010—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1983-10-18. For this dossier, Kevin, Ngan and Hong is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “hong Kong fencer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6397091. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1983, 2006 and 2010.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kevin Ngan”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kevin Ngan primary sources, Kevin Ngan archive and Kevin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kevin Ngan”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Kevin Ngan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.