CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Kato Panagia Monastery

monastery in Artaion Municipality, Greece

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ12881170 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Kato Panagia Monastery (Greek: Μονή Κάτω Παναγιάς) is a monastery at the foot of Peranthi hill, about 20 minutes west of Arta, next to the river Arachthos.

History

It was founded in 1250 by the despot of Epirus Michael II Doukas and his wife, later Saint Theodora (holiday 11 March). Its foundation coincides with the period when the Despotate of Epirus was flourishing.

Kato Panagia was named to distinguish it from Parigoritissa, which is built on a higher level than the monastery. It is one of three monasteries that Michael built as a sign of his repentance. Biographer of Saint Theodora Job Monk (17th century) reported the marital infidelity into which Michael fell with an Artine noblewoman, Gangrini, from whom he had two illegitimate sons. The other two monasteries are Panagia toni Vlacherna, in the homonymous village of Vlacherna, and of Agios Georgios, where the current church of Saint Theodora is located in Arta. Theodora lived as a nun for the last 10 years of her life until her death in 1280, when the monastery was renamed for Saint Theodora.

Ledger

From the original building complex, only the Catholic church, with its cross-roofed architecture, ornate ceramic decoration and built-in marble volumes taken from the ruins of the neighboring Amvrakia, is preserved. On the western exterior is a clearly visible monogram of Michael Doukas, despot of Epirus from 1237 - 1270.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Kato Panagia Monastery” as monastery in Artaion Municipality, Greece. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Kato, Panagia and Monastery.

Editorial reviewMost useful as a place-based finding aid connecting the present description to earlier jurisdictions, maps and built evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1250, 1280, 1237, 1270—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1250. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Kato, Panagia and Monastery providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Kato Panagia Monastery”, the useful work is to connect “monastery in Artaion Municipality, Greece” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q12881170. Authority coordinates are 39.145, 20.990. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1250, 1280, 1237 and 1270.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kato Panagia Monastery”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kato Panagia Monastery primary sources, Kato Panagia Monastery archive and Kato research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kato Panagia Monastery”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Kato Panagia Monastery” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.