CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Kathleen Krekels

Flemish politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 2, 2025
Entity authorityQ17149632 ↗
Source-derived summary

Kathleen Krekels (born 5 June, 1968 in Deurne) is a Belgian-Flemish politician for the New Flemish Alliance (N-VA).

Krekels has been a municipal councilor in Schilde since 2013 and since 2018 has been the alderman for the town. Since 2014, she has served as a member of the Flemish Parliament where she focuses on matters related to education and sits with the Education Committee.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Kathleen Krekels” is flemish politician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Kathleen, Krekels and Flemish, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1968, 2013, 2018, 2014—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1968-06-05. For this dossier, Kathleen, Krekels and Flemish is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “flemish politician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 2, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q17149632. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1968, 2013, 2018 and 2014.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kathleen Krekels”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kathleen Krekels primary sources, Kathleen Krekels archive and Kathleen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kathleen Krekels”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Kathleen Krekels” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.