Katarzyna Piter
Polish tennis player
Katarzyna Piter (Polish pronunciation: [kataˈʐɨna ˈpitɛr]; born 16 February 1991) is a Polish professional tennis player who specializes in doubles.
On 12 May 2014, she reached her career-high ranking of No. 95 in singles and on 9 June 2025, she achieved her best doubles ranking of No. 49. Piter has won six doubles titles on the WTA Tour and two on WTA 125 tournaments, as well as eight singles and 26 doubles titles on the ITF Women's Circuit.
Career
In July 2013, at the Palermo Ladies Open, Piter won her first title on the WTA Tour. She and partner Kristina Mladenovic upset Karolína and Kristýna Plíšková in the final, in a super-tiebreak.
Partnered with Fanny Stollár, she also won the doubles title at the 2023 Budapest Grand Prix, defeating Jessie Aney and Anna Sisková inna champions tiebreak in the final. The pair defended their title in Budapest the following year, beating Anna Danilina and Irina Khromacheva in the final which again went to a deciding champions tiebreak. Piter and Stollár were runners-up in the doubles at the 2024 Guangzhou Open, losing to top seeds Kateřina Siniaková and Zhang Shuai in the final.
The public source identifies “Katarzyna Piter” as polish tennis player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Katarzyna, Piter and Polish.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Katarzyna Piter”, the useful work is to connect “polish tennis player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q83562. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1991, 2014, 2025 and 2013.
Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Katarzyna Piter”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Katarzyna Piter primary sources, Katarzyna Piter archive and Katarzyna research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Katarzyna Piter”?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Katarzyna Piter” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.