CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Caspar Schatzgeyer

German clergyman

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ110601 ↗
Source-derived summary

Caspar Schatzgeyer (c. 1464 – 1527) was a German Franciscan and a foremost opponent of the Protestant reformer Martin Luther in Germany.

Biography

He was born at Landshut in Bavaria in 1463 or 1464. For many years he was guardian at Munich, and since 1517 first provincial superior of the Strasbourg religious province of the Friars Minor, and definitor-general.

In 1523 he was appointed inquisitor for Germany (the Holy Roman Empire). Schatzgeyer energetically opposed the new doctrine as heretical errors, both in word and writing. It is in great part due to him and his confreres that the Catholic Faith held its ground in southern Germany, and that the Bavarian Government strenuously defended its cause. Within a few years he published upwards of twenty-three works in which he defended the Catholic position on such doctrines as grace, the veneration of saints, monasticism, the indissolubility of marriage, the Mass, purgatory etc.

He died at Munich in 1527.

His writings have received the highest praise from John Eck, who collected and published them at Ingolstadt in 1543.

Sources

This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Caspar Schatzgeyer” is german clergyman. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Caspar, Schatzgeyer and German, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1464, 1527, 1463, 1517—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1463-01-01, 1464-01-01—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. For this dossier, Caspar, Schatzgeyer and German is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “german clergyman” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q110601. VIAF identifies the subject as 24687730. The Library of Congress control number is n84219343. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1464, 1527, 1463 and 1517.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Caspar Schatzgeyer”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Caspar Schatzgeyer primary sources, Caspar Schatzgeyer archive and Caspar research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Caspar Schatzgeyer”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Caspar Schatzgeyer” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.