CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Karanje

human settlement in India

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ48734239
Source-derived summary

Karanje is a village in the Karmala taluka of Solapur district in Maharashtra state, India.

Demographics

Covering 1,005 hectares (2,480 acres) and comprising 420 households at the time of the 2011 census of India, Karanje had a population of 1799. There were 958 males and 841 females, with 184 people being aged six or younger.

Editorial summary

“Karanje” enters the record as human settlement in India. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Karanje, human and settlement can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011, 1799—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Karanje, human and settlement.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Karanje” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Karanje, human and settlement provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q48734239. Authority coordinates are 18.410, 75.245. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2011 and 1799.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Karanje”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Karanje primary sources, Karanje archive and Karanje research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Karanje”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Karanje” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.