CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Karancs Hills

range of hills on the Hungarian-Slovakian border

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 11, 2024
Entity authorityQ1104473 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Karancs Hills (Slovak: Mučínska vrchovina) are a range of hills on the Hungarian-Slovakian border. The highest peak is the Karancs at 729 metres (2,392 ft) above sea level.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Karancs Hills” as range of hills on the Hungarian-Slovakian border. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 29-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Karancs, Hills and range can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as range of hills on the Hungarian-Slovakian border. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 11, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q1104473. Authority coordinates are 48.158, 19.789. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Karancs Hills”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Karancs Hills primary sources, Karancs Hills archive and Karancs research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Karancs Hills”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Karancs Hills” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.