Möbius–Kantor polygon
Open-knowledge reference entry

In geometry, the Möbius–Kantor polygon is a regular complex polygon 3{3}3, , in
C
2
{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{2}}
. 3{3}3 has 8 vertices, and 8 edges. It is self-dual. Every vertex is shared by 3 triangular edges. Coxeter named it a Möbius–Kantor polygon for sharing the complex configuration structure as the Möbius–Kantor configuration, (83).
Discovered by G.C. Shephard in 1952, he represented it as 3(24)3, with its symmetry, Coxeter called as 3[3]3, isomorphic to the binary tetrahedral group, order 24.
Coordinates
The 8 vertex coordinates of this polygon can be given in
C
3
{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{3}}
, as:
where
ω
=
−
1
+
i
3
2
{\displaystyle \omega ={\tfrac {-1+i{\sqrt {3}}}{2}}}
.
As a configuration
The configuration matrix for 3{3}3 is:
[
8
3
3
8
]
{\displaystyle \left[{\begin{smallmatrix}8&3\\3&8\end{smallmatrix}}\right]}
Its structure can be represented as a hypergraph, connecting 8 nodes by 8 3-node-set hyperedges.
Real representation
It has a real representation as the 16-cell, , in 4-dimensional space, sharing the same 8 vertices. The 24 edges in the 16-cell are seen in the Möbius–Kantor polygon when the 8 triangular edges are drawn as 3-separate edges.
The public source identifies “Möbius–Kantor polygon” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Möbius, Kantor and polygon.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Möbius–Kantor polygon”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 19, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q28000194. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1952.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Möbius–Kantor polygon”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Möbius–Kantor polygon primary sources, Möbius–Kantor polygon archive and Möbius research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Möbius–Kantor polygon”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Möbius–Kantor polygon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.