CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Möbius–Kantor polygon

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 19, 2025
Entity authorityQ28000194
Source-derived summary

In geometry, the Möbius–Kantor polygon is a regular complex polygon 3{3}3, , in

C

2

{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{2}}

. 3{3}3 has 8 vertices, and 8 edges. It is self-dual. Every vertex is shared by 3 triangular edges. Coxeter named it a Möbius–Kantor polygon for sharing the complex configuration structure as the Möbius–Kantor configuration, (83).

Discovered by G.C. Shephard in 1952, he represented it as 3(24)3, with its symmetry, Coxeter called as 3[3]3, isomorphic to the binary tetrahedral group, order 24.

Coordinates

The 8 vertex coordinates of this polygon can be given in

C

3

{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{3}}

, as:

where

ω

=

1

+

i

3

2

{\displaystyle \omega ={\tfrac {-1+i{\sqrt {3}}}{2}}}

.

As a configuration

The configuration matrix for 3{3}3 is:

[

8

3

3

8

]

{\displaystyle \left[{\begin{smallmatrix}8&3\\3&8\end{smallmatrix}}\right]}

Its structure can be represented as a hypergraph, connecting 8 nodes by 8 3-node-set hyperedges.

Real representation

It has a real representation as the 16-cell, , in 4-dimensional space, sharing the same 8 vertices. The 24 edges in the 16-cell are seen in the Möbius–Kantor polygon when the 8 triangular edges are drawn as 3-separate edges.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Möbius–Kantor polygon” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Möbius, Kantor and polygon.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1952—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Möbius, Kantor and polygon providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Möbius–Kantor polygon”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 19, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q28000194. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1952.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Möbius–Kantor polygon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Möbius–Kantor polygon primary sources, Möbius–Kantor polygon archive and Möbius research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Möbius–Kantor polygon”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Möbius–Kantor polygon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.