CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Kangtoap Padevat

Khmer language weekly newspaper in Cambodia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 10, 2023
Entity authorityQ6362903 ↗
Source-derived summary

Kangtoap Padevat (Revolutionary Army) was a Khmer language weekly newspaper in Cambodia, published in the 1980s. The first issue appeared in December 1979. Kongtoap Padevat was the organ of the Kampuchean People's Revolutionary Armed Forces.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Kangtoap Padevat” as khmer language weekly newspaper in Cambodia. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Kangtoap, Padevat and Khmer.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1979—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1979-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Kangtoap, Padevat and Khmer providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Kangtoap Padevat”, the useful work is to connect “khmer language weekly newspaper in Cambodia” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 10, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q6362903. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1979.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kangtoap Padevat”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kangtoap Padevat primary sources, Kangtoap Padevat archive and Kangtoap research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kangtoap Padevat”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Kangtoap Padevat” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.