CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Kang Han-na

South Korean actress

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ16080045 ↗
Source-derived summary

Kang Han-na (Korean: 강한나; born January 30, 1989) is a South Korean actress. Kang played several lead roles in films and television series, including Moon Lovers: Scarlet Heart Ryeo (2016), Rain or Shine (2017), Familiar Wife (2018), Start-Up (2020), My Roommate Is a Gumiho (2021), and Bon Appétit, Your Majesty (2025).

Early life and education

Kang received both her Bachelor and Master of Theater from Chung-Ang University.

Career

2009–2015: Career beginnings

Kang made her film debut in the short films, Last Homecoming and King of Guitar, both in 2009.

In 2013, she began playing minor roles in mainstream films Fasten Your Seatbelt, Commitment and Friend: The Great Legacy. The same year, Kang made her television debut in the romantic comedy drama Miss Korea.

Kang played her first lead role in the period film Empire of Lust in 2015, playing a gisaeng. She then starred in the short film, Stand in the same year.

2016–present: Rising popularity

Kang rose to fame with her role as an evil queen in the historical drama Moon Lovers: Scarlet Heart Ryeo. She was nominated for the "Excellence Award, Actress in a Fantasy Drama" at the 2016 SBS Drama Awards and "Best New Actress" at the 53rd Baeksang Arts Awards.

Editorial summary

“Kang Han-na” enters the record as south Korean actress. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Kang, Han-na and South can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1989, 2016, 2017, 2018—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1989-01-30. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Kang, Han-na and South.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Kang Han-na” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Kang, Han-na and South provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16080045. VIAF identifies the subject as 42153061251819201608. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1989, 2016, 2017 and 2018.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kang Han-na”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kang Han-na primary sources, Kang Han-na archive and Kang research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kang Han-na”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Kang Han-na” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.