Gladys Kahaka
Namibian biochemist
Gladys Karirirue Kahaka is a Namibian biotechnologist who was a recipient of the 2012 L'Oréal-UNESCO Awards for Women in Science. She was the first Namibian to receive the award. She studies the genetics and molecular structure of plants.
Life and work
Gladys Kahaka was born in Botswana and moved to Namibia. Kahaka grew up at Gam, Namibia in the Tsumkwe region and completed her schooling at Jakob Marengo Secondary School in Windhoek. After graduation she earned a BSc in biology and chemistry at the University of Namibia with research centered around the preservation of the biological and chemistry resources of Namibia through biotechnology. She went on to complete her doctoral thesis at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom aided by the L'Oréal-UNESCO Award, which allowed her to pursue her doctoral research.
In particular, she has identified genes in organisms, leading to a better understanding of their interaction with the environment. She is studying three endangered species: cheetahs, killed by farmers, ximenia, a tree that bears nutritious fruit, and devil's claw, a medicinal plant that is threatened with extinction.
Devil's claw, Harpagophytum, can provide a source of income for poor local farmers in Namibia which is the largest exporter of the medicinal plant.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Gladys Kahaka” is namibian biochemist. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Gladys, Kahaka and Namibian, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “namibian biochemist” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q22132801. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2012.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Gladys Kahaka”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Gladys Kahaka primary sources, Gladys Kahaka archive and Gladys research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Gladys Kahaka”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Gladys Kahaka” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.