CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Kadomsky Uyezd

subdivision of the eighteenth-century Russian empire

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 9, 2024
Entity authorityQ111911778 ↗
Source-derived summary

Kadomsky Uyezd (Russian: Кадомский уезд) was one of the subdivisions of the Tambov Governorate of the Russian Empire in 1779–1796. Its administrative centre was Kadom.

History

31 December 1796 Kadomsky uyezd was disestablished, Kadom became a city in Temnikovsky Uyezd.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Kadomsky Uyezd” as subdivision of the eighteenth-century Russian empire. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1779, 1796—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Kadomsky, Uyezd and subdivision can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as subdivision of the eighteenth-century Russian empire. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 9, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q111911778. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1779 and 1796.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kadomsky Uyezd”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kadomsky Uyezd primary sources, Kadomsky Uyezd archive and Kadomsky research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kadomsky Uyezd”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Kadomsky Uyezd” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.