Elizabeth Kabanda
Ugandan lawyer and judge
Elizbeth Kibula Kabanda is a Ugandan lawyer and judge, who serves as a Justice of the High Court of Uganda, since 2013. Prior to that, she served as the Deputy Registrar in-charge of the Criminal Division of High Court.
Background and education
She was admitted to Makerere University, Uganda's oldest and largest public university, to study law, graduating with a Bachelor of Laws degree. She also has a Diploma in Legal Practice, obtained from the Law Development Centre, in Kampala. She is a registered legal practitioner in Uganda and a member of the Uganda Bar.
Career
When she was first appointed to the High Court, she was assigned to the Land Division. In 2015, she was transferred from the Land Division to the Criminal Division.
In 2016, Justice Kabanda was assigned to the newly-created Mpigi Circuit, on a caretaker basis. She also served temporarily in the Mubende Circuit in 2016 and early 2017.
One of the cases she has presided over, include the case of State vs Stella Nyanzi, where the government accuses Stella Nyanzi, of two counts of Cyber Harassment and Offensive Communication contrary to the Computer Misuse Act of 2011.
“Elizabeth Kabanda” enters the record as ugandan lawyer and judge. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Elizabeth, Kabanda and Ugandan can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Elizabeth Kabanda” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Elizabeth, Kabanda and Ugandan provides the most credible route into that argument.
Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q51558144. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Elizabeth Kabanda”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Elizabeth Kabanda primary sources, Elizabeth Kabanda archive and Elizabeth research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Elizabeth Kabanda”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Elizabeth Kabanda” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.