CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

K Line Northern Extension

proposed light rail transit corridor in Central Los Angeles

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ56064144
Source-derived summary

The K Line Northern Extension, formerly known as the Crenshaw Northern Extension, is a planned Los Angeles Metro Rail light rail extension connecting Expo/Crenshaw station to Hollywood/Highland station in Hollywood. The corridor is a fully underground, north–south route along mostly densely populated areas on the western side of the Los Angeles Basin; it would be operated as part of the K Line. Los Angeles Metro is prioritizing the project along with pressure from the West Hollywood residents. Construction is slated to start in 2041 and begin service by 2047, although local officials are attempting to accelerate this timeline using Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD).

On July 23, 2024, LA Metro released the draft of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the K Line Northern Extension, putting the price tag of the project between $11 billion and $14.8 billion (including a 40% contingency cost).

Overview

Los Angeles Metro budgeted $2.33 billion from Measure M. The Crenshaw/LAX corridor Line was a corridor designated for public transit. It became a light rail line between the C Line and the E Line, with planned connections to LAX. After almost ten years of construction, the K Line, as it was named, opened in 2022. A northern extension could connect with regional job centers and tourist destinations, such as Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Beverly Center, The Grove, Farmers Market shopping area, and LACMA. The West Hollywood areas are also in the projected routes, Melrose and the Sunset Strip within walking distance.

Original planning

The original plans for the Crenshaw Corridor project connected Wilshire Blvd to LAX. However, during the environmental review, Metro determined that if LRT were selected as the preferred mode, the cost for the entire route would exceed the project budget. In December 2009, the Metro Board decided on LRT as the preferred mode; as a result, the part of the corridor north of Exposition Boulevard was deferred until funds became available.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “K Line Northern Extension” as proposed light rail transit corridor in Central Los Angeles. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Line, Northern and Extension.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2041, 2047, 2024, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Line, Northern and Extension providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “K Line Northern Extension”, the useful work is to connect “proposed light rail transit corridor in Central Los Angeles” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q56064144. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2041, 2047, 2024 and 2022.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “K Line Northern Extension”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow K Line Northern Extension primary sources, K Line Northern Extension archive and Line research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “K Line Northern Extension”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from K Line Northern Extension” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.