CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

KUMT

talk radio station in Randolph, Utah, United States

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ6339489
Source-derived summary

KUMT (107.9 FM) is a radio station licensed to Randolph, Utah, United States, and serving the Salt Lake City metropolitan area. The station's transmitter is located on Humpy Peak in the Uinta Mountain range. Under the previous calls, KUDD and prior, the stations transmitter was located near Promontory Point, Utah, in Box Elder County.

History

Commercial (1984–2016)

Country (1984–1986)

The station was first licensed in 1984. The station held the callsign KRGO, and aired a country music format, simulcasting sister station KRGO 1550.

Oldies (1986–1992)

On September 19, 1986, the station's callsign was changed to KRPN. As KRPN, the station aired an oldies format, and was branded "WKRP".

Hard rock (1992)

On February 10, 1992, the station's callsign was changed to KZQQ-FM. As KZQQ-FM in 1992, the station aired the Z Rock heavy metal format.

Country (1992–1996)

On September 14, 1992, the station adopted a country music format. On December 28, 1992, the station's callsign was changed to KRGQ-FM, and on May 12, 1995, the station's callsign was changed to KRGO.

Rock (1996–1997)

On October 18, 1996, the station's callsign was changed to KRKR. As KRKR, the station aired a rock format as "K-Rock".

Adult standards (1997–1998)

In July 1997, the station began airing the "Timeless" adult standards format, and was known as "Sunny 107.9".

Editorial summary

“KUMT” enters the record as talk radio station in Randolph, Utah, United States. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what KUMT, talk and radio can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1984, 2016, 1986, 1550—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1984-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around KUMT, talk and radio.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“KUMT” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, KUMT, talk and radio provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6339489. Authority coordinates are 41.258, -112.440. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1984, 2016, 1986 and 1550.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “KUMT”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow KUMT primary sources, KUMT archive and KUMT research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “KUMT”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from KUMT” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.