CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

KAFAC Sports Complex

stadium in Mungyeong, South Korea

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ28446840 ↗
Source-derived summary

The KAFAC Stadium is a multi-purpose stadium in Mungyeong, Korea, used for track and field and association football. It was the main stadium for the 2015 Military World Games and is the home stadium of the Korea Armed Forces Athletic Corps, after which it is named. For the 2015 games it hosted the opening ceremony and both the football and track and field competitions. It has a seating capacity of 10,000.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “KAFAC Sports Complex” is stadium in Mungyeong, South Korea. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through KAFAC, Sports and Complex, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, KAFAC, Sports and Complex is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “stadium in Mungyeong, South Korea” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q28446840. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “KAFAC Sports Complex”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow KAFAC Sports Complex primary sources, KAFAC Sports Complex archive and KAFAC research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “KAFAC Sports Complex”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “KAFAC Sports Complex” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.