Heawood family
Open-knowledge reference entry

In graph theory the term Heawood family refers to either one of the following two related graph families generated via ΔY- and YΔ-transformations:
the family of 20 graphs generated from the complete graph
K
7
{\displaystyle K_{7}}
.
the family of 78 graphs generated from
K
7
{\displaystyle K_{7}}
and
K
3
,
3
,
1
,
1
{\displaystyle K_{3,3,1,1}}
.
In either setting the members of the graph family are collectively known as Heawood graphs, as the Heawood graph is a member.
This is in analogy to the Petersen family, which too is named after its member the Petersen graph.
The Heawood families are significant in topological graph theory.
They contain the smallest known examples of intrinsically knotted graphs, of graphs that are not 4-flat, and of graphs with Colin de Verdière graph invariant
μ
=
6
{\displaystyle \mu =6}
.
The
K
7
{\displaystyle K_{7}}
-family
The
K
7
{\displaystyle K_{7}}
-family is generated from the complete graph
K
7
{\displaystyle K_{7}}
through repeated application of ΔY- and YΔ-transformations.
The family consists of 20 graphs, all of which have 21 edges.
The unique smallest member,
K
7
{\displaystyle K_{7}}
, has seven vertices.
The unique largest member, the Heawood graph, has 14 vertices.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Heawood family” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q129261463. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Heawood family”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Heawood family primary sources, Heawood family archive and Heawood research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Heawood family”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Heawood family” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.