CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Jūzenji

Japanese god

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ123524325
Source-derived summary

Jūzenji (Japanese: 十禅師) is a Japanese deity associated with Hiyoshi Taisha and Enryaku-ji. He was worshipped as one of the seven key emanations of Sanno Gongen.

This powerful potent god was a benevolent miracle-worker, but at the same time, he was also an adorcist and mediumistic god, a malefic and wild god, a judge, a terrifying god who punishes and curses those who sin or do not properly worship him. He is a complex deity seen as ambivalent both cursing and blessing people. He is compared to Janus in his ambivalent nature. He was a god who conveyed oracles, not only appearing in people's dreams, but also possessing children and delivering oracles through them. He played a special role as a messenger of Sanno (Ōmiya (commonly considered the main Sannō line)), who connected the world of the gods with the human world, and its oracles were closely linked to Sanno Gongen. It is believed that He, being a divine child (Mikogami), acted as an agent to carry out punishments and curses in order to convey the will of his parent, Ōmiya.

Jūzenji has many other aspects, a placenta deity, an earthly god associated with serpentine beings (such as Ugajin), a companion deity worshipped in astral cults (Worship of heavenly bodies), and a god of male–male sexuality. He is normally depicted as a boy or a young monk His name derives from a government position that was prominent during the Heian period but had declined by the time his faith began; this position consisted of ten Buddhist monks.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Jūzenji” as japanese god. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Jūzenji and Japanese.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 257-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Jūzenji and Japanese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Jūzenji”, the useful work is to connect “japanese god” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q123524325. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jūzenji”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jūzenji primary sources, Jūzenji archive and Jūzenji research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jūzenji”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Jūzenji” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.