CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Justas Sinica

Lithuanian basketball player (born 1985)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ3811542 ↗
Source-derived summary

Justinas "Justas" Sinica (born 31 May 1985) is a Lithuanian former professional basketball player.

Professional career

On September 15, 2016, Sinica signed with Nevėžis Kėdainiai of Lithuanian Basketball League. On August 27, 2018, Sinica signed with RETAbet Bilbao Basket of the LEB Oro.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Justas Sinica” as lithuanian basketball player (born 1985). Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1985, 2016, 2018—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1985-05-31. The account is most persuasive where Justas, Sinica and Lithuanian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as lithuanian basketball player (born 1985). Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3811542. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1985, 2016 and 2018.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Justas Sinica”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Justas Sinica primary sources, Justas Sinica archive and Justas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Justas Sinica”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Justas Sinica” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.