CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Juris Laipenieks

Chilean athletics competitor of Latvian origin

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ23652666 ↗
Source-derived summary

Juris Laipenieks (born 9 April 1940) is a retired Chilean athlete. He competed in the men's decathlon at the 1960 Summer Olympics.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Juris Laipenieks” is chilean athletics competitor of Latvian origin. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Juris, Laipenieks and Chilean, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1940, 1960—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1940-01-01, 1940-04-09—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. For this dossier, Juris, Laipenieks and Chilean is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “chilean athletics competitor of Latvian origin” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q23652666. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1940 and 1960.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Juris Laipenieks”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Juris Laipenieks primary sources, Juris Laipenieks archive and Juris research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Juris Laipenieks”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Juris Laipenieks” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.