CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Juno Awards of 2013

Edition of Canadian music awards

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 27, 2025
Entity authorityQ6314188 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Juno Awards of 2013 honoured Canadian music industry achievements in the latter part of 2011 and in most of 2012. The awards were presented in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, during the weekend of 20–21 April 2013. The main ceremony was hosted by Michael Bublé at the Brandt Centre. The city of Moose Jaw also hosted some supporting events.

Events

The Juno Cup charity hockey game was held in Moose Jaw at Mosaic Place.

Most awards were presented at a private gala on 20 April at the Credit Union Eventplex.

Main ceremony performers

The main awards ceremony was held at the Brandt Centre on 21 April and televised on CTV. The following artists performed the setlist below in order during the ceremony:

Serena Ryder - "Stompa"

The Sheepdogs - "Feeling Good"

Carly Rae Jepsen - "Call Me Maybe" and "Tonight I'm Getting Over You"

The Tenors - "Forever Young"

Marianas Trench - "Fallout" and "Stutter"

Michael Bublé - "It's a Beautiful Day"

Billy Talent - "Stand Up and Run" with Serena Ryder

Classified - "Inner Ninja" with David Myles

Hannah Georgas - "Robotic"

Metric - "Synthetica"

k.d. lang - "Sing It Loud"

Michael Bublé - "Home"

Nominees and winners

Nominees were announced on 19 February 2013. Music journalist Larry Leblanc was this year's Walt Grealis Special Achievement Award recipient.

This year's inductee to the Canadian Music Hall of Fame is k.d.

Editorial summary

“Juno Awards of 2013” enters the record as edition of Canadian music awards. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Juno, Awards and Edition can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013, 2011, 2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Juno, Awards and Edition.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Juno Awards of 2013” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Juno, Awards and Edition provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q6314188. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013, 2011 and 2012.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Juno Awards of 2013”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Juno Awards of 2013 primary sources, Juno Awards of 2013 archive and Juno research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Juno Awards of 2013”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Juno Awards of 2013” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.