CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Julio Lores

Peruvian footballer (1908-1947)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ1361938
Source-derived summary

Julio Lores Colán (born 15 September 1908 - death 15 July 1947) was a Peruvian-Mexican professional football forward who played for Peru in the 1930 FIFA World Cup and for Mexico. He played for Ciclista Lima, and later for the Mexican club Necaxa. He also was part of “Los Once Hermanos” (“The Eleven Brothers”).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Julio Lores” is peruvian footballer (1908-1947). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Julio, Lores and Peruvian, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1908, 1947, 1930—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1908-09-15. For this dossier, Julio, Lores and Peruvian is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “peruvian footballer (1908-1947)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1361938. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1908, 1947 and 1930.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Julio Lores”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Julio Lores primary sources, Julio Lores archive and Julio research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Julio Lores”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Julio Lores” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.