CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Judges 2

Book of Judges, chapter 2

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ12485097
Source-derived summary

Judges 2 is the second chapter of the Book of Judges in the Old Testament or the Hebrew Bible. According to Jewish tradition the book was attributed to the prophet Samuel, but modern scholars view it as part of the Deuteronomistic History, which spans the books of Deuteronomy to 2 Kings, attributed to nationalistic and devotedly Yahwistic writers during the time of the reformer Judean king Josiah in 7th century BCE. This chapter focuses on the military failure and apostasy of the Israelites following the introduction in the first chapter.

Text

This chapter was originally written in the Hebrew language. It is divided into 23 verses.

Textual witnesses

Some early manuscripts containing the text of this chapter in Hebrew are of the Masoretic Text tradition, which includes the Codex Cairensis (895), Aleppo Codex (10th century), and Codex Leningradensis (1008).

Extant ancient manuscripts of a translation into Koine Greek known as the Septuagint (originally was made in the last few centuries BCE) include Codex Vaticanus (B;

G

{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {G}}}

B; 4th century) and Codex Alexandrinus (A;

G

{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {G}}}

A; 5th century).

Old Testament references

Judges 2:6–8: Joshua 24:29–33

Judges 2:10–23: Isaiah 43:22–28; Jeremiah 2:23–37

Angel of the Lord at Bochim (2:1–5)

This brief section about a theophany serves as a connecting link between the previous and the subsequent chapters, responding to the Israelites' request for divine guidance in Judges 1:1 with a reminder about God's covenantal promise to give Israel the land (back to the era of the patriarchs) being kept faithfully as witnessed by the redemption from Egypt (Judges 2:1), but the future of the covenant was conditional to the faithfulness of Israel, as a covenant partner, to YHWH alone. The failure to drive out the enemy described in 1:28–36 were not really because of military weakness (1:19), but due to the unfaithfulness of Israel to the covenant (2:2–3). People's reaction to these harsh predictions provides the etymology for

the place where the angel appeared (2:4–5).

Verse 1

Then the Angel of the LORD came up from Gilgal to Bochim, and said: "I led you up from Egypt and brought you to the land of which I swore to your fathers; and I said, 'I will never break My covenant with you'"

"The Angel of the Lord": from Hebrew מלאך יהוה, malak YHWH as also used in Haggai 1:13; of prophets in Isaiah 42:19; Malachi 3:6; of priests in Malachi 2:7, interpreted as "a messenger of the Lord".

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Judges 2” is book of Judges, chapter 2. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Judges, Book and chapter, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful identification and reception guide that helps separate the work itself from editions, performances, ownership and later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1008—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Judges, Book and chapter is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “book of Judges, chapter 2” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q12485097. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1008.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Judges 2”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Judges 2 primary sources, Judges 2 archive and Judges research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Judges 2”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Judges 2” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.