CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Jucheer

Chanyu of the Southern Xiongnu from 147 to 172

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ2512613
Source-derived summary

Jucheer (居車兒) was a Xiongnu of unknown relationship to the royal dynastic lineage who succeeded Doulouchu as chanyu in 147 AD. In 166 AD, Jucheer joined the Xianbei and Wuhuan in raiding Han territory. When the Wuhuan and Xiongnu were confronted by Han forces they immediately surrendered. Zhang Huan wanted to have Jucheer dismissed, but Emperor Huan of Han was unwilling to remove an established ruler and deemed Jucheer to be an innocent party forced into rebellion. Jucheer died in 172 AD and was succeeded by his son Tute Ruoshi Zhujiu.

Footnotes

References

Barfield, Thomas (1989), The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, Basil Blackwell

Bichurin N.Ya., "Collection of information on peoples in Central Asia in ancient times", vol. 1, Sankt Petersburg, 1851, reprint Moscow-Leningrad, 1950

Chang, Chun-shu (2007), The Rise of the Chinese Empire 1, The University of Michigan Press

Cosmo, Nicola Di (2002), Ancient China and Its Enemies, Cambridge University Press

Cosmo, Nicola di (2009), Military Culture in Imperial China, Harvard University Press

Crespigny, Rafe de (2007), A Biographical Dictionary of Later Han to the Three Kingdoms, Brill

Loewe, Michael (2000), A Biographical Dictionary of the Qin, Former Han, and Xin Periods, Brill

Taskin B.S., "Materials on Sünnu history", Science, Moscow, 1968, p.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Jucheer” as chanyu of the Southern Xiongnu from 147 to 172. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1989, 1851, 1950, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Jucheer, Chanyu and Southern can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as chanyu of the Southern Xiongnu from 147 to 172. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2512613. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1989, 1851, 1950 and 2007.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jucheer”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jucheer primary sources, Jucheer archive and Jucheer research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jucheer”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Jucheer” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.