CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Josef Lexer

luger

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 19, 2022
Entity authorityQ6279972 ↗
Source-derived summary

Josef Lexer is a former Austrian luger who competed in the early 1970s. A natural track luger, he won the gold medal in the men's doubles event at the 1970 FIL European Luge Natural Track Championships in Kapfenberg, Austria.

References

External links

Natural track European Championships results 1970-2006.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Josef Lexer” as luger. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Josef, Lexer and luger.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1970, 2006—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Josef, Lexer and luger providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Josef Lexer”, the useful work is to connect “luger” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 19, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q6279972. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1970 and 2006.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Josef Lexer”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Josef Lexer primary sources, Josef Lexer archive and Josef research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Josef Lexer”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Josef Lexer” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.