CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Jorge Marcelo Vitorino

Chinese association football player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 8, 2023
Entity authorityQ56630930 ↗
Source-derived summary

Jorge Marcelo Vitorino (born 7 October 1999) is a Macanese footballer who currently plays as a forward for Lun Lok.

Career statistics

Club

As of 13 March 2021.

Notes

International

As of matches played 14 September 2018.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Jorge Marcelo Vitorino” as chinese association football player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Jorge, Marcelo and Vitorino.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999, 2021, 2018—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1999-10-07. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Jorge, Marcelo and Vitorino providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Jorge Marcelo Vitorino”, the useful work is to connect “chinese association football player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 8, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q56630930. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1999, 2021 and 2018.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jorge Marcelo Vitorino”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jorge Marcelo Vitorino primary sources, Jorge Marcelo Vitorino archive and Jorge research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jorge Marcelo Vitorino”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Jorge Marcelo Vitorino” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.