Jordan and Einstein frames
different conventions for the metric tensor, in a theory of a dilaton coupled to gravity
The Lagrangian in scalar-tensor theory can be expressed in the Jordan frame or in the Einstein frame, which are field variables that stress different aspects of the gravitational field equations and the evolution equations of the matter fields. In the Jordan frame the scalar field or some function of it multiplies the Ricci scalar in the Lagrangian and the matter is typically coupled minimally to the metric, whereas in the Einstein frame the Ricci scalar is not multiplied by the scalar field and the matter is coupled non-minimally. As a result, in the Einstein frame the field equations for the space-time metric resemble the Einstein equations but test particles do not move on geodesics of the metric. On the other hand, in the Jordan frame test particles move on geodesics, but the field equations are very different from Einstein equations. The causal structure in both frames is always equivalent and the frames can be transformed into each other as convenient for the given application.
Christopher Hill and Graham Ross have shown that there exist "gravitational contact terms" in the Jordan frame, whereby the action is modified by graviton exchange. This modification leads back to the Einstein frame as the effective theory.
Contact interactions arise in Feynman diagrams when a vertex contains a power of the exchanged momentum,
q
2
{\displaystyle q^{2}}
, which then cancels against the Feynman propagator,
1
/
q
2
{\displaystyle 1/q^{2}}
, leading to a point-like interaction. This must be included as part of the effective action of the theory. When the contact term is included results for amplitudes in the Jordan frame will be equivalent to those in the Einstein frame, and
results of physical calculations in the Jordan frame that omit the contact terms will generally be incorrect.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Jordan and Einstein frames” is different conventions for the metric tensor, in a theory of a dilaton coupled to gravity. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Jordan, Einstein and frames, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “different conventions for the metric tensor, in a theory of a dilaton coupled to gravity” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3748109. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Jordan and Einstein frames”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Jordan and Einstein frames primary sources, Jordan and Einstein frames archive and Jordan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jordan and Einstein frames”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Jordan and Einstein frames” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.