CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Jones Morgan

American supercentenarian

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ16013047
Source-derived summary

Jones Morgan (October 23, 1882 – August 29, 1993) was an American man who claimed to have served as a Buffalo Soldier with the 9th Cavalry Regiment during the Spanish–American War. Contemporary accounts reported that Morgan joined the regiment while underage and served with the unit in Cuba in 1898, where he performed support duties rather than participating in combat.

Morgan was widely reported as the last surviving veteran of the Spanish–American War, but his military service could not be confirmed through surviving official records. His military records were reportedly destroyed in a fire, and the lack of documentation led to continuing uncertainty over his status as a veteran.

Service

Morgan, being an African-American, joined the 9th Cavalry Regiment as a Buffalo Soldier in 1896. Being underage upon his enlistment would later contribute to the argument surrounding the legitimacy of Morgan's claims. Morgan served in a primary maintenance role, tending the horses of the Rough Riders and cooking meals for his fellow soldiers.

Later years

Morgan fell into poverty in his old age, being provided free meals from church charity efforts. By 1986 he was renting a room, surviving on his Social Security pension check.

In the much later years of his life, especially after the death of Nathan E. Cook, who had long been hailed as not only the last surviving veteran of the Spanish–American War but of any American engagement, debate raged over the trustworthiness of Jones Morgan's claim to have served.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Jones Morgan” as american supercentenarian. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Jones, Morgan and American.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1882, 1993, 1898, 1896—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Jones, Morgan and American providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Jones Morgan”, the useful work is to connect “american supercentenarian” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16013047. The first chronological checks are 1882, 1993, 1898 and 1896.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jones Morgan”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jones Morgan primary sources, Jones Morgan archive and Jones research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jones Morgan”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Jones Morgan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.