CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Jonathan N. Dixon

English/Australian writer and film director

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ21663064 ↗
Source-derived summary

Jonathan N. Dixon is an English / Australian writer and film director. His directorial debut horror film Wrath was released in 2011. His other films include the comedy Pictocrime (2004), which won best international feature at the LA Film Festival, and shorts Body in the Trunk (2006) and Phillip (2007).

Early life and education

Jonathan N. Dixon was born in Bath, UK. He moved with his family to Andalusia, Spain when he was seven years old.

Studying art and design, he began working as a graphic artist and moved to Australia in his late teens.

Career

After graduating from art college, Dixon began his career in marketing by working for a Japanese publishing house and spent time in Tokyo and Osaka, Japan. After several years he returned to Austria and hired a small film studio where he wrote, directed, edited, produced, and animated, "Force Five" a stop animation film. "Force Five" followed five secret agents who were part of C.E.N.T.E.R (Central Enforcement Network Targeting Evil Rogues) who would parachute into southern Bavaria during WW2 in order to kill the head of O.C.T.O (Official Crime & Terror Organisation). Dixon built the sets and designed the miniature characters by using remote control technology with mini servers in the characters heads. The movie was shot on a Bolex 16mm film camera.

Editorial summary

“Jonathan N. Dixon” enters the record as english/Australian writer and film director. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Jonathan, Dixon and English can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011, 2004, 2006, 2007—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1972-01-14. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Jonathan, Dixon and English.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Jonathan N. Dixon” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Jonathan, Dixon and English provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21663064. VIAF identifies the subject as 315583026. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2011, 2004, 2006 and 2007.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Jonathan N. Dixon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Jonathan N. Dixon primary sources, Jonathan N. Dixon archive and Jonathan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jonathan N. Dixon”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Jonathan N. Dixon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.