Jonathan Kvanvig
American writer
Jonathan Lee Kvanvig (born December 7, 1954) is Professor of Philosophy at Washington University in St. Louis.
Kvanvig has published extensively in areas such as epistemology, philosophy of religion, logic, and philosophy of language. Some of his books include Rationality and Reflection, The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding, and The Problem of Hell (published 1993), which debates Hell in a modern theological and philosophical way.
Up until 2019, he was the owner and administrator of the blog Certain Doubts, which covered topics related to epistemology.
Selected bibliography
Religious Disagreement and Pluralism, ed. with Matthew A. Benton, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Depicting Deity: A Metatheological Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
Faith and Humility, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. (Paperback edition 2021.)
Rationality and Reflection: How to Think about What to Think, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
The public source identifies “Jonathan Kvanvig” as american writer. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Jonathan, Kvanvig and American.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Jonathan Kvanvig”, the useful work is to connect “american writer” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6273611. VIAF identifies the subject as 49248140. The Library of Congress control number is n85290211. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1954, 1993, 2019 and 2022.
A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Jonathan Kvanvig”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Jonathan Kvanvig primary sources, Jonathan Kvanvig archive and Jonathan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Jonathan Kvanvig”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Jonathan Kvanvig” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.