John of Nully
French knight
John of Nully (French: Jean de Neuilly or Nully) was a knight of Medieval France who became the first Baron of Passavant in the Principality of Achaea, a crusader state in Southern Greece. The date of his death is unknown.
Life
John of Nully is believed to have been the son of Vilain of Nully, a native of Nully in northeastern France and close friend of the historian Geoffrey of Villehardouin. John made his crusade vow in 1218 and arrived in the Peloponnese in 1220. There he established the fortress of Passavant or Passava (the name is a corruption of "passe avant", a toponym in northeastern France and likely a war-cry or the Nully family motto) on the Taygetus mountains between the Mani Peninsula and the plain of Laconia. The castle, sited to keep watch over the unruly Maniots and the Slavic tribe on Mount Taygetos, became the seat of the Barony of Passavant with four knight's fiefs. Nully was named hereditary marshal of Achaea.
John of Nully married a sister of Walter of Rosières, the Baron of Akova, and had a single daughter: Margaret of Passavant, the common heiress to both Passavant and Akova. Margaret had been sent to Constantinople as a hostage, and when she returned to Greece in ca. 1275, the Peloppenese was restored to Byzantine control.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “John of Nully” is french knight. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through John, Nully and French, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “french knight” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16332915. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1218, 1220 and 1275.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “John of Nully”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow John of Nully primary sources, John of Nully archive and John research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “John of Nully”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “John of Nully” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.