CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

John Lodge (librarian)

Librarian of the University of Cambridge and Rector of Cumberworth and Anderby

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ44158236 ↗
Source-derived summary

John Lodge (1792/93 – 27 August 1850) was the librarian (bibliothecarius) of the University of Cambridge from 1828 to 1845.

Editorial summary

“John Lodge (librarian)” enters the record as librarian of the University of Cambridge and Rector of Cumberworth and Anderby. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what John, Lodge and librarian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1792, 1850, 1828, 1845—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1793-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around John, Lodge and librarian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“John Lodge (librarian)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, John, Lodge and librarian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q44158236. VIAF identifies the subject as 1542170292139377690000. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1792, 1850, 1828 and 1845.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “John Lodge (librarian)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow John Lodge (librarian) primary sources, John Lodge (librarian) archive and John research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “John Lodge (librarian)”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “John Lodge (librarian)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.