CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

John Hardin Young

American legal scholar

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ6237730 ↗
Source-derived summary

John "Jack" Hardin Young is a retired trial lawyer who has a reputation for work in election law and electoral recounts, as well as complex commercial litigation. He was on the team of lawyers for the Vice President Gore during the 2000 Florida election recount and the Bush v. Gore case, and is portrayed in the HBO film "Recount". He is widely known for being the first advocate for a statewide recount strategy that could have resulted in a win for Gore.

Young is currently senior counsel at Sandler, Reiff, Lamb, Rosenstein & Birkenstock where he focuses on election law, including regulatory policy, corporate litigation, and dispute resolution. Young served on the Board of Governors for the American Bar Association and was Chair of the 50,000 member Senior Lawyer Division of the ABA for the year 2017–2018, as well Chair of the Administrative & Regulatory Section in 2019-2000. He currently serves as a special advisor to the

Central European and Eurasian Law Initiative Council.

Young is a former adjunct a professor of international and comparative election law at The College of William & Mary Law School from 2008-2023 and has taught at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and George Mason School of Law. He continues to serve on the National Center for State Courts- William & Mary Law School Election Law Advisory Committee. He is currently a registered lobbyist with the League of Women Voters of Delaware.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “John Hardin Young” as american legal scholar. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around John, Hardin and Young.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 2017, 2018, 2019—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with John, Hardin and Young providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “John Hardin Young”, the useful work is to connect “american legal scholar” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6237730. VIAF identifies the subject as 188215668. The Library of Congress control number is n79054706. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000, 2017, 2018 and 2019.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “John Hardin Young”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow John Hardin Young primary sources, John Hardin Young archive and John research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “John Hardin Young”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “John Hardin Young” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.