CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

John C. Knapp

American academic

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ20711092 ↗
Source-derived summary

John C. Knapp (born May 13, 1959) is a leadership consultant and former American academic administrator who served as the 13th president of Washington & Jefferson College in Washington, Pennsylvania. Previously, he was the 12th president of Hope College, a private Christian liberal arts college located in Holland, Michigan.

Education

In 1981, Knapp earned a Bachelor of Science degree in urban life with a concentration in communication from Georgia State University. Following his bachelor's degree, he completed his Master of Arts degree in theological studies at Columbia Theological Seminary in 1995. In 1999, Knapp earned the Doctor of Philosophy degree in theology and religious studies at the University of Wales, where his dissertation, “Self-Deception and Moral Blindness in The Modern Corporation,” was supervised by Peter Baelz. At the time, Knapp was an Honorary Visiting Lecturer at the university. He was awarded the honorary Doctor of Letters (D.Litt.) degree by Hope College in 2013.

Career

Leadership consulting

Following his career in the academic presidency, Knapp returned to his earlier work as a consultant.

Research and writing

Knapp has published five books titled For the Common Good: The Ethics of Leadership in the 21st Century (Praeger, 2006); Leaders on Ethics: Real-World Perspectives on Today's Business Challenges (Praeger, 2007); The Business of Higher Education (ABC-CLIO, 2009), three volumes focusing on how universities cope with pressure to strengthen accountability and efficiency; and How the Church Fails Businesspeople (and What Can Be Done About It) (William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2011), which provides insight regarding the relationship between faith and work. His latest book is Ghostwriting and The Ethics of Authenticity (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), an exploration of the ethics, history and practice of ghostwriting in a wide range of practical contexts.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “John C. Knapp” is american academic. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through John, Knapp and American, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1959, 1981, 1995, 1999—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1959. For this dossier, John, Knapp and American is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american academic” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q20711092. VIAF identifies the subject as 28963634. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1959, 1981, 1995 and 1999.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “John C. Knapp”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow John C. Knapp primary sources, John C. Knapp archive and John research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “John C. Knapp”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “John C. Knapp” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.