CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

John of Shanghai and San Francisco

Eastern Orthodox ascetic (1896-1966)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ552432 ↗
Source-derived summary

John of Shanghai and San Francisco (Russian: Иоанн Шанхайский и Сан-Францисский, romanized: Ioann Shankhayskiy i San-Frantsisskiy; born Mikhail Borisovich Maximovitch, Russian: Михаил Борисович Максимович; June 4, 1896 – July 2, 1966) was a prelate of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia who is venerated as a saint in the Eastern Orthodox Church.

He is also referred to as "John, the Wonderworker" and John Maximovitch.

Life

Early life

Mikhail Maximovitch was born on June 4, 1896, in the village of Adamovka of the Izyumsky Uyezd of the Kharkov Governorate of the Russian Empire (in present-day eastern Ukraine).

Growing up, he collected icons and church books, and indulged heavily in the reading of the lives of saints. As a child, he converted his French caretaker from Catholicism to Eastern Orthodoxy.

Maximovitch attended Poltava Military School from 1907 to 1914. Later, he attended and received a degree in law from Kharkov Imperial University in 1918. He studied and attended church in Kharkiv, where he was inspired by Metropolitan Antony Khrapovitsky to deepen his religious understanding. He later recalled that the local monastery had become more important in his life than secular institutions.

Yugoslavia

John's family moved to Yugoslavia and brought him to Belgrade in 1921.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “John of Shanghai and San Francisco” is eastern Orthodox ascetic (1896-1966). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through John, Shanghai and Francisco, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1896, 1966, 1907, 1914—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1896-06-04. For this dossier, John, Shanghai and Francisco is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “eastern Orthodox ascetic (1896-1966)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q552432. VIAF identifies the subject as 4287096. The Library of Congress control number is n79114071. 2 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1896, 1966, 1907 and 1914.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “John of Shanghai and San Francisco”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow John of Shanghai and San Francisco primary sources, John of Shanghai and San Francisco archive and John research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “John of Shanghai and San Francisco”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “John of Shanghai and San Francisco” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.