CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Johannes Harlemius

Dutch Jesuit Bible scholar and hebraist (1538-1578)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 23, 2025
Entity authorityQ86633029 ↗
Source-derived summary

Johan Willemsz, latinized Johannes Harlemius (1538–1578), was a Dutch Jesuit and Hebraist from Haarlem who taught at the Jesuit house of studies in Leuven. He briefly taught Hebrew at the Collegium Trilingue (1567–1568). An expert on the Old Testament, he advised on both the Plantin Polyglot (1573) and Lucas Brugensis's revision of the Leuven Vulgate (1574).

References

External links

"Harlemius, Joannes". Jesuitica.be. Retrieved 2020-02-29.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Johannes Harlemius” is dutch Jesuit Bible scholar and hebraist (1538-1578). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Johannes, Harlemius and Dutch, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1538, 1578, 1567, 1568—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Johannes, Harlemius and Dutch is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “dutch Jesuit Bible scholar and hebraist (1538-1578)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 23, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q86633029. The first chronological checks are 1538, 1578, 1567 and 1568.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Johannes Harlemius”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Johannes Harlemius primary sources, Johannes Harlemius archive and Johannes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Johannes Harlemius”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Johannes Harlemius” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.